Appeals Process

Decision Review Officer

3 min read

Definition

A senior VA employee who conducts higher-level reviews and can overturn prior rating decisions based on existing evidence.

In This Article

What Is a Decision Review Officer

A Decision Review Officer (DRO) is a senior VA employee who reviews your disability claim at the Higher Level Review stage and can change or overturn a prior Rating Decision using only the evidence already in your file. Unlike an appeal to the Board of Veterans' Appeals, a DRO review does not consider new evidence.

How the DRO Review Process Works

When you request a Higher Level Review within one year of your Rating Decision, your claim goes to a DRO instead of returning to the original rater. The DRO must be someone who did not work on your initial claim. This person conducts what VA calls a "de novo" review, meaning they look at your case fresh, but they're limited to the evidence already submitted.

The DRO can approve a higher rating, approve a lower rating, or uphold the original decision. If they find clear and unmistakable error in the original rating decision, they can overturn it. This is the key distinction: a DRO has authority to change ratings based on how the existing evidence should have been evaluated under VA rules, not based on new medical evidence or new lay statements.

Processing time for a DRO review typically ranges from 4 to 6 months. There is no hearing requirement, though you can request one. Many veterans find it helpful to submit a detailed statement explaining why the original rater misapplied VA rating criteria to the medical evidence already in the file.

Strategic Considerations for Your DRO Review

  • Evidence strategy: Since no new medical evidence is allowed, focus on pointing out how existing records support a higher rating under the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities. If your C&P exam notes show functional limitations that weren't fully considered, highlight this in your statement.
  • Nexus clarity: If your original claim lacked a clear nexus letter connecting your service to the condition, a DRO cannot fix this gap without new evidence. A DRO can only re-evaluate what's already there.
  • VSO assistance: A Veterans Service Officer can be valuable at the DRO stage. They know which existing evidence strongest supports rating increases and can frame arguments in VA regulatory language.
  • Timing matters: You must request a Higher Level Review within one year of the Rating Decision. After that window closes, your only option is a supplemental claim with new evidence or a Board appeal.

Common Questions

  • Can a DRO grant a rating higher than I requested in my claim? Yes. A DRO can assign any rating level supported by the evidence in your file, even if you only asked for a lower increase. This is one advantage of the DRO review process.
  • What happens if the DRO reduces my rating? You have appeal rights. You can then file a supplemental claim with new evidence, request a Board review of the DRO decision, or pursue other appeal options. Rating reductions are not automatic if new evidence contradicts the lower decision.
  • Should I submit a written statement with my DRO review request? Strongly consider it. A focused statement explaining why the existing medical evidence supports a higher rating, with specific references to VA rating criteria, gives the DRO a clear roadmap for why the original decision was incorrect.

Higher Level Review is the formal review process through which you reach a DRO. Rating Decision is the initial determination that triggers your right to DRO review. Understanding the relationship between these three concepts is essential to managing your claim timeline and choosing the right appeal path.

Disclaimer: VetClaimGuide is a document preparation tool. We do not file claims on your behalf, provide legal advice, or represent veterans before the VA. Not affiliated with the Department of Veterans Affairs or the Department of Defense.

Related Terms

VetClaimGuide
Start My Claim